76 cm long, Khazar Empire semi-nomadic iron sword, 650-965 AD Length: 76 cm = 30 inches; Length of the blade: 69 cm ...

76 cm long, Khazar Empire semi-nomadic iron sword, 650-965 AD Length: 76 cm = 30 inches; Length of the blade: 69 cm = 27.25 inches; Weight: 448 g; Condition: genuine stable rust, do not required additional preservation; Provenance: Private collection in London, United Kingdom; before - Private Oxfordshire collection; formerly acquired on the European art market from pre-2000 collections. References: The Khazars[a] (/ˈxɑːzɑːrz/) were a semi-nomadic Turkic people that in the late 7th-century AD established a major commercial empire covering the southeastern section of modern European Russia, southern Ukraine, Crimea, and Kazakhstan.[11] They created what for its duration was the most powerful polity to emerge from the break-up of the Western Turkic Khaganate.[12] Astride a major artery of commerce between Eastern Europe and Southwestern Asia, Khazaria became one of the foremost trading empires of the early medieval world, commanding the western marches of the Silk Road and playing a key commercial role as a crossroad between China, the Middle East and Kievan Rus'.[13][14] For some three centuries (c. 650–965) the Khazars dominated the vast area extending from the Volga-Don steppes to the eastern Crimea and the northern Caucasus.[15] Khazaria long served as a buffer state between the Byzantine Empire and both the nomads of the northern steppes and the Umayyad Caliphate and Abbasid Caliphate, after serving as the Byzantine Empire's proxy against the Sasanian Empire. The alliance was dropped around 900. Byzantium began to encourage the Alans to attack Khazaria and to weaken its hold on Crimea and the Caucasus and sought to obtain an entente with the rising Rus' power to the north, which it aspired to convert to Christianity.[16] Between 965 and 969, the Kievan Rus' ruler, Sviatoslav I of Kiev, as well as his allies, conquered the capital, Atil, and ended Khazaria's independence. The brief rump state that ensued was again overrun, and the Khazars were dispersed or absorbed into surrounding populations. Determining the origins and nature of the Khazars is closely bound with theories of their languages, but it is a matter of intricate difficulty since no indigenous records in the Khazar language survive, and the state was polyglot and polyethnic. The native religion of the Khazars is thought to have been Tengrism, like that of the North Caucasian Huns and other Turkic peoples.[17] The poly-ethnic populace of the Khazar Khaganate appears to have been a multi-confessional mosaic of pagan, Tengrist, Jewish, Christian and Muslim worshippers.[18] Some of the Khazars (i.e., Kabars) joined the ancient Hungarians in the 9th century. The ruling elite of the Khazars was said by Judah Halevi and Abraham ibn Daud to have converted to Rabbinic Judaism in the 8th century,[19] but the scope of the conversion to Judaism within the Khazar Khanate remains uncertain.[20] Where the Khazars dispersed after the fall of the Empire is subject to many conjectures. Proposals have been made regarding the possibility of a Khazar factor in the ethnogenesis of numerous peoples, such as the Hazaras, Hungarians, the Kazakhs, the Cossacks of the Don region and of Ukraine, Bukharan Jews, the Muslim Kumyks, the Turkic-speaking Krymchaks and their Crimean neighbors the Crimean Karaites, the Moldavian Csángós, the Mountain Jews, even some Subbotniks (on the basis of their Ukrainian and Cossack origin and others).[21][22][23] The late 19th century saw the emergence of the theory that the core of today's Ashkenazi Jews are descended from a hypothetical Khazarian Jewish diaspora which migrated westward from modern-day Russia and Ukraine into modern-day France and Germany.